From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of Trustees v. Stodola

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 11, 1996
931 S.W.2d 443 (Ark. 1996)

Opinion

96-948

Opinion delivered November 11, 1996

1. APPEAL ERROR — ATTORNEY'S DUTY TO MAKE HIMSELF AWARE OF DATE ON WHICH BRIEF WAS DUE. — The rules of the supreme court clearly state that the appellant must file a brief within forty days of lodging the record; it is the attorney's, not the court's, responsibility to make himself aware of the date on which his brief was due. 2. APPEAL ERROR — MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED — MOTION TO FILE BELATED BRIEF GRANTED. — The supreme court denied the separate appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal and granted appellant's motion to file a belated brief.

Motion to Dismiss; denied.

Motion to File Belated Brief; granted.

Tell Hulett, for appellant.

Stephen Cobb, Pulaski County Att'y's Office, for separate appellee Pulaski County.


On October 14, 1996, the separate appellee, Pulaski County, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because the appellant had failed to timely file its brief or to request an extension.

On October 15, 1996, Tell Hulett, counsel for the appellant, filed a motion for extension of time to file a belated brief. Hulett lodged the record on August 15, 1996, and, according to Ark. S. Ct. R. 4-4(a), was required to file his brief by September 24, 1996. As of today, Hulett has not filed the brief nor has he been granted an extension.

[1] Hulett explains that he failed to file a timely brief because the Supreme Court Clerk did not notify him of the date on which his brief was due. The rules clearly state that the appellant must file a brief within forty days of lodging the record. Ark. S. Ct. R. 4-4(a). It is Hulett's, not the court's, responsibility to make himself aware of the date on which his brief was due.

[2] The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. The motion to file a belated brief is granted. A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See also Baker v. State, (slip op. CR96-502, November 11, 1996) ( per curiam).


Summaries of

Board of Trustees v. Stodola

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 11, 1996
931 S.W.2d 443 (Ark. 1996)
Case details for

Board of Trustees v. Stodola

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF TRUSTEES for the City of Little Rock Police Pension Fund v . Mark…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 11, 1996

Citations

931 S.W.2d 443 (Ark. 1996)
931 S.W.2d 443

Citing Cases

Western Carroll Cty. Amb. Dist. v. Johnson

Therefore, a copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See Board of…

Board of Trustees v. Stodola

Hulett lodged the record on August 15, 1996, and according to Ark. S. Ct. R. 4-4(a) was required to file his…