From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of Trade v. Castagnola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 11, 1963
18 A.D.2d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

February 11, 1963


Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Findings of fact which may be inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, the proof established that the conveyance in question was made for a fair consideration and without any fraudulent intent. Hence, defendants were entitled to a dismissal of the complaint. Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur; Ughetta, Acting P.J., and Christ, J., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment.


Summaries of

Board of Trade v. Castagnola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 11, 1963
18 A.D.2d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Board of Trade v. Castagnola

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF TRADE OF THE WHOLESALE SEAFOOD MERCHANTS, INC., Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
238 N.Y.S.2d 362