From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of Education v. New York State United Teachers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 25, 1980
417 N.E.2d 92 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued November 14, 1980

Decided November 25, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, LEON D. LAZER, J.

Jeffrey S. Karp, James R. Sandner and Donald Congress for appellants.

Oscar J. Bloom for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Special Term denying a stay of arbitration should be reinstated.

The arbitration provisions of the parties' contract broadly and unambiguously embraced all claimed violations of the contract. The ambiguity, if any, in the provisions alleged to have been violated is, therefore, a matter for the arbitrator to resolve. (Matter of Wyandanch Union Free School Dist. v Wyandanch Teachers Assn., 48 N.Y.2d 669, 671.)

In addition, allowing arbitration of this grievance would violate no public policy. Although a board of education may not bargain away its authority to grant or deny tenure, it may limit its right to terminate a probationary teacher during the probationary period. (Board of Educ. v Barni, 49 N.Y.2d 311; Matter of Candor Cent. School Dist. [ Candor Teachers Assn.], 42 N.Y.2d 266.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, reinstated in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Board of Education v. New York State United Teachers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 25, 1980
417 N.E.2d 92 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Board of Education v. New York State United Teachers

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF EDUCATION, MT. SINAI UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 25, 1980

Citations

417 N.E.2d 92 (N.Y. 1980)
417 N.E.2d 92
435 N.Y.S.2d 980

Citing Cases

Woods v. State Univ. of N.Y.

Rather, we are faced with the dismissal of a probationary employee with nearly 12 years of service in the…

Police Assn. v. Buffalo

Likewise, the Taylor Law does not require that disputes over the termination of probationary employees be…