From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of Ed. of C. S. Dist. of C. of Cinc. v. Wilhelmy

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 23, 2010
C-1-08-860 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2010)

Opinion

C-1-08-860.

February 23, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 16) to which neither party has objected.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 16) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. The decision of the State Level Review Officer is AFFIRMED.

This case is DISMISSED AND TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Board of Ed. of C. S. Dist. of C. of Cinc. v. Wilhelmy

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 23, 2010
C-1-08-860 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Board of Ed. of C. S. Dist. of C. of Cinc. v. Wilhelmy

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF CINCINNATI…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

C-1-08-860 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Maple Heights City Sch. Bd. of Educ. v. A.C.

However, while the court must give the SLRO deference in matters requiring educational expertise, the Court…

B.H. v. West Clermont Bd. of Educ.

While this Court must afford the SLRO deference where educational expertise is applied, it will not “second…