I. The permanent location of the branch office of the Canton Exchange Bank (which was admittedly outside the Town of Ridgeland) was authorized by statute. Board of Disability Relief, City of Pascagoula v. Hudson, 229 Miss. 631, 91 So.2d 718; Board of Trustees of Kingston Consolidated School District v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 102; City of Hazlehurst v. Myers, 96 Miss. 656, 51 So. 890; Day v. Hart, 232 Miss. 516, 99 So.2d 656; First National Bank of Memphis v. State Tax Comm., 210 Miss. 590, 49 So.2d 410, 50 So.2d 146; Hammer v. Yazoo Delta Lumber Co., 100 Miss. 349, 56 So. 466, 490; Sec. 5228, Code 1942. II. The facility which the First National Bank established was not sufficient to constitute a branch bank. Deposit Guaranty Bank Trust Co. v. J.F. Weaver Lumber Co., 215 Miss. 183, 60 So.2d 598; McCallum v. Laird, 244 Miss. 273, 142 So.2d 32; McKeithen v. Bush, 201 Miss. 664, 29 So.2d 310; Shaw v. Shaw (Miss.), 194 So. 751; Young v. Elgin (Miss.), 27 So. 595.

The title cannot add to or extend the operation of the act." Giles v. Friendly Fin. Co. of Biloxi, 185 So.2d 659, 662 (Miss. 1966) (citing Bd. of Trs. of Kingston Consol. Sch. Dist. v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 105 (1958)). Further, headings and titles generally "cannot limit the plain meaning of the text."

We cited the title to the Act not for the purpose of showing its entire scope and purpose but for aid in ascertaining legislative intent or relieving ambiguity in the body of the Act (though we see none). Board of Trustees of Kingston Consolidated School District v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 102 (1958). Obviously the purpose of the Act was to provide for a uniform method of cancellation and non-renewal of automobile insurance policies. It is our duty to meet the real meaning of the framers.

The title cannot add to or extend the operation of the act. Board of Trustees of Kingston Consolidated School District v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 102 (1958); and, Russell v. State, 231 Miss. 176, 94 So.2d 916 (1957). The title may not be used to create an ambiguity in the act.

The sole question presented to this court by this appeal is whether the one year limitation prescribed by Section 610, Code of 1942, or the four year limitation prescribed by Section 725, Code of 1942, is applicable. Adams v. Board of Supervisors of Union County, 177 Miss. 403, 170 So. 684; Adams v. City of Clarksdale, 95 Miss. 88, 48 So. 242; A.H. George Co. v. Louisville N.R. Co., 88 Miss. 306, 40 So. 486; Anderson v. Leland, 48 Miss. 253; Board of Trustees of Kingston Consolidated School District v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 102; Capps v. Dodd (Texas Civ. App.), 246 S.W.2d 267; County Board of Education of Jones County v. Smith, 239 Miss. 53, 121 So.2d 139; Edwards v. Hawkins (Texas Civ. App.), 77 S.W.2d 1098; Estes v. Memphis C.R. Co., 152 Miss. 814, 119 So. 199; Greaves v. Hinds County, 166 Miss. 89, 145 So. 900; Gully, State Tax Collector v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co., 176 Miss. 388, 166 So. 541; Hassie Hunt Trust v. Proctor, 215 Miss. 84, 60 So.2d 551; Leavenworth Son v. Hunter, 150 Miss. 245, 116 So. 593; McElyea v. Bowles (Texas Civ. App.), 233 S.W.2d 482; McNeely v. Natchez, 148 Miss. 268, 114 So. 484; Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. Brewer, 157 Miss. 890, 128 So. 83; Mitchell v. Finley, 161 Miss. 527, 137 So. 330; Murray v. Oliver (Texas Civ. App.), 61 S.W.2d 534; Powell v. Buchanan, 245 Miss. 4, 147 So.2d 110; Sovereign Camp, W.O.W. v. Durr, 186 Miss. 850, 192 So. 45; Starnes v. Sumners (Texas Civ. App.), 239 S.W.2d 880; Waco Cotton Oil Mill of Waco v. Walker (Texas Civ. App.), 103 S.W.2d 1071

The order of the State Educational Finance Commission is a valid order, entered pursuant to jurisdiction conferred by the Legislature; and its effect is to legally transfer the students involved. Adams v. Board of Suprs. of Union County, 177 Miss. 403, 170 So. 684; Adams v. First National Bank, 103 Miss. 744, 60 So. 770; Board of Trustees of Kingston School District v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 102; Boutwell v. Board of Suprs. of Jasper County, 128 Miss. 337, 91 So. 12; Broom v. Board of Suprs. of Jefferson Davis County, 171 Miss. 586, 158 So. 344; Craft v. DeSoto County, 79 Miss. 618, 30 So. 204; Hassie Hunt Trust v. Proctor, 215 Miss. 84, 60 So.2d 551; Hinton v. Perry County, 84 Miss. 536, 36 So. 565; Renfro v. Givens, 207 Miss. 531, 42 So.2d 734. IV. Section 6248-07, Mississippi Code of 1942, Recompiled, does not violate any provision of the Mississippi Constitution.

IV. The cases against the endorsers of the note and the maker of the note were properly consolidated in the court below. Complaints and objections to such consolidation may not be raised in the Supreme Court for the first time. Adams v. Board of Suprs. of Union County, 177 Miss. 403, 170 So. 684; Hassie Hunt Trust v. Proctor, 215 Miss. 84, 60 So.2d 551; Kingston Consol. School Dist. v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 102; Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. Brewer, 157 Miss. 890, 128 So. 83; 1 Am. Jur., Actions, Secs. 93, 95; 3 Am. Jur., Appeal and Error, Sec. 339; Griffith's Mississippi Chancery Practice (2d ed.), Sec. 506. GILLESPIE, J.

II. There is no constitutional contravention by such imposition under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Collation of authorities: Adams v. Bank of Oxford, 78 Miss. 532, 29 So. 402; Adams v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co., 77 Miss. 194, 24 So. 200; Alabama v. Plantation Pipe Line Co., 265 Ala. 69, 89 So.2d 549; Alabama v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. (Ala.), 123 So.2d 172; Attala County v. Kelly, 68 Miss. 40, 8 So. 376; Bailey v. Southern Bell Tel. Tel. Co., 206 Miss. 723, 40 So.2d 606; Ballard v. Mississippi Cotton Oil Co., 81 Miss. 507, 34 So. 533; Bank of Morton v. State Bond Comm. (Miss.), 199 So. 507; Board of Trustees of Kingston Consol. School Dist. v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 102; Butterfield Lumber Co. v. Guy, 92 Miss. 361, 46 So. 78; Columbus G.R. Co. v. Miller, 283 U.S. 96, 75 L.Ed. 861; Connecticut Light Power Co. v. Federal Power Comm., 324 U.S. 515, 89 L.Ed. 1150; Dejarnett v. Haynes, 23 Miss. 600; Detroit, City of v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 495, 2 L.Ed.2d 460; Federal Power Comm. v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591, 88 L.Ed. 333; Federal Power Comm. v. Interstate Natural Gas Co., 336 U.S. 577, 93 L.Ed. 895; Federal Power Comm. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 337 U.S. 498, 93 L.Ed. 1499; Federal Trade Comm. v. National Gas Co., 357 U.S. 560, 2 L.Ed.2d 1540; First Nat. Bank of Memphis v. State Tax Comm., 210 Miss. 590, 49 So.2d 410; German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Lewis, 233 U.S. 389, 58 L.Ed. 1011; Great Northern R. Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co., 259 U.S. 285, 66 L.Ed. 943; Gulf S.I.R. Co. v. Ellis, 165 U.S. 150, 41 L.Ed. 666; Gulf S.I.R. Co. v. Hewes, 183 U.S. 66, 46 L.Ed. 86; Gulf S.I.R. Co. v. Mississippi R. Comm., 94 Miss. 124, 49 So. 118; Henr

II. There is no constitutional contravention by such imposition under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Collation of authorities: Adams v. Bank of Oxford, 78 Miss. 532, 29 So. 402; Adams v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co., 77 Miss. 194, 24 So. 200; Alabama v. Plantation Pipe Line Co., 265 Ala. 69, 89 So.2d 549; Alabama v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. (Ala.), 123 So.2d 172; Attala County v. Kelly, 68 Miss. 40, 8 So. 376; Bailey v. Southern Bell Tel. Tel. Co., 206 Miss. 723, 40 So.2d 606; Ballard v. Mississippi Cotton Oil Co., 81 Miss. 507, 34 So. 533; Bank of Morton v. State Bond Comm. (Miss.), 199 So. 507; Board of Trustees of Kingston Consol. School Dist. v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 102; Butterfield Lumber Co. v. Guy, 92 Miss. 361, 46 So. 78; Columbus G.R. Co. v. Miller, 283 U.S. 96, 75 L.Ed. 861; Connecticut Light Power Co. v. Federal Power Comm., 324 U.S. 515, 89 L.Ed. 1150; Dejarnett v. Haynes, 23 Miss. 600; Detroit, City of v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 495, 2 L.Ed.2d 460; Federal Power Comm. v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591, 88 L.Ed. 333; Federal Power Comm. v. Interstate Natural Gas Co., 336 U.S. 577, 93 L.Ed. 895; Federal Power Comm. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 337 U.S. 498, 93 L.Ed. 1499; Federal Trade Comm. v. National Gas Co., 357 U.S. 560, 2 L.Ed.2d 1540; First Nat. Bank of Memphis v. State Tax Comm., 210 Miss. 590, 49 So.2d 410; German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Lewis, 233 U.S. 389, 58 L.Ed. 1011; Great Northern R. Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co., 259 U.S. 285, 66 L.Ed. 943; Gulf S.I.R. Co. v. Ellis, 165 U.S. 150, 41 L.Ed. 666; Gulf S.I.R. Co. v. Hewes, 183 U.S. 66, 46 L.Ed. 86; Gulf S.I.R. Co. v. Mississippi R. Comm., 94 Miss. 124, 49 So. 118; Hen

I. The statute and the sentence. Board of Trustees Kingston Consol. School Dist. v. Forman, 233 Miss. 42, 101 So.2d 102; Dukate v. Adams, 101 Miss. 433, 58 So. 475; Ellis v. State, 59 Tex.Crim. 630, 130 S.W. 171; Lewis v. Simpson, 176 Miss. 123, 167 So. 780; Martin v. State, 190 Miss. 32, 199 So. 98; Mississippi Cottonseed Products v. Stone, 184 Miss. 409, 184 So. 428, 306 U.S. 656, 83 L.Ed. 1054, 59 S.Ct. 774; State v. Hacker (Mo.), 214 S.W.2d 413; State v. Louisville N.R. Co., 97 Miss. 35, 53 So. 454; State v. Russell, 185 Miss. 13, 187 So. 540; 82 C.J.S., Statutes, Sec. 342; Wharton's Criminal Law Procedure (Anderson), Sec. 40. II. The trial court properly sustained respondent's motion to dismiss the petition and discharge the writ.