Opinion
December Term, 1897.
Motion to dismiss the appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. All concurred, except Hardin, P.J., and Follett, J., dissenting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
BOAK v. HAMILTON TUBE COMPANY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1897
24 App. Div. 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Summaries of
BOAK v. HAMILTON TUBE COMPANY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1897
24 App. Div. 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for
BOAK v. HAMILTON TUBE COMPANY
Case Details
Full title:William C. Boak, Respondent, v. The Hamilton Tube Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1897
Citations
24 App. Div. 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)