From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bluntson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 17, 2005
912 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 1D03-4056.

October 17, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Joseph Q. Tarbuck, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Jonathan Barry Bluntson, Pro Se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The appellant challenges convictions for burglary and grand theft, which were obtained upon a trial held after the appellant requested that his court-appointed counsel be discharged. The appellant expressed dissatisfaction with counsel's representation, and asked for other counsel. Despite the appellant having filed a motion for such discharge, and again raising the issue immediately before jury selection, the court did not conduct the inquiry required under Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). See also Hardwick v. State, 521 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 871, 109 S.Ct. 185, 102 L.Ed.2d 154 (1988). Due to the absence of a proper Nelson inquiry, the appellant's convictions are reversed and the case is remanded.

BARFIELD, ALLEN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bluntson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 17, 2005
912 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Bluntson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jonathan Barry BLUNTSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

912 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)