From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blunt v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2008
1:06-cv-00463-OWW-TAG HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008)

Opinion

1:06-cv-00463-OWW-TAG HC.

February 22, 2008


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 12)


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed his petition on April 6, 2006. (Doc. 1). On November 21, 2007, the Court ordered Respondent to file a response. (Doc. 9). On February 13, 2006, Respondent filed the instant motion requesting an enlargement of time within which to file his response. (Doc. 12). As grounds therefore, Respondent contends that the press of work and the complexity and number of issues raised by Petitioner has prevented him from complying with the Court's original schedule.

Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's motion for enlargement of time (Doc. 12), is GRANTED. The time for filing Respondent's responsive pleading is extended through and including March 27, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Blunt v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2008
1:06-cv-00463-OWW-TAG HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Blunt v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL ALLEN BLUNT, Petitioner, v. JAMES YATES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 22, 2008

Citations

1:06-cv-00463-OWW-TAG HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008)