Opinion
14 Civ. 2333 (AT)(GWG)
04-18-2019
SAMUEL BLUNT, Petitioner, v. ADA PEREZ, SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent.
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION :
This order replaces the Court's order dated April 9, 2019 at ECF No. 31 in its entirety. --------
On March 11, 2019, Petitioner pro se, Samuel Blunt, filed a document entitled "motion to amend action and/or consolidation." ECF No. 29. On March 20, 2019, after careful consideration, the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R&R"), recommending that Petitioner's motion be denied. ECF No. 30. On April 9, 2019, having received no timely objections, this Court reviewed the R&R for clear error, and finding none, issued an order adopting the R&R in its entirety. ECF No. 31.
On April 15, 2019, the Court received Petitioner's untimely objections to the R&R. ECF No. 32. Because it appears that Petitioner mailed his objections within the statutory time period, see id. at 4, and because pro se litigants are accorded special solicitude, see Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976), the Court will review Petitioner's objections. Upon review, the Court finds that Petitioner's objections are indecipherable and "not clearly aimed at particular findings in the [R&R]," Bailey v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Serv., No. 13 Civ. 1064, 2014 WL 2855041, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2014). The Court, therefore, once again, reviews the R&R for clear error. Id.; see also Wallace v. Superintendent of Clinton Corr. Facility, No. 13 Civ. 3989, 2014 WL 2854631, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2014). The Court finds none. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Petitioner's motion is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner pro se.
SO ORDERED. Dated: April 18, 2019
New York, New York
/s/_________
ANALISA TORRES
United States District Judge