Opinion
14 Civ. 2333 (AT)(GWG)
04-09-2019
SAMUEL BLUNT, Petitioner, v. ADA PEREZ, SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION :
On March 11, 2019, Petitioner pro se, Samuel Blunt, filed a document entitled "motion to amend action and/or consolidation." ECF No. 29. After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Gorenstein issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R & R"), proposing that Petitioner's motion be denied. Despite notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error. E.g., Hicks v. Ercole, 09 Civ. 2531, 2015 WL 1266800, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2015). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety. Petitioner's motion is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 29 and to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner pro se.
SO ORDERED. Dated: April 9, 2019
New York, New York
/s/_________
ANALISA TORRES
United States District Judge