From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blunk v. Fenton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 15, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00080-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00080-WYD-MJW

03-15-2013

CHANTEL L. BLUNK, Plaintiff(s), v. DR. LYNNE FENTON individually, DR. LYNNE FENTON as an employee of COLORADO UNIVERSITY, COLORADO UNIVERSITY, DOES 1 through 5, inclusive, Defendant(s).


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration on Motion to Continue Scheduling/Planning Conference (Docket No. 10) is granted to the extent that the Scheduling Conference set on March 21, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET on May 8, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their proposed Scheduling Order on or before May 1, 2013. Plaintiff shall forthwith obtain a waiver of service or effectuate service on the defendants so that the Scheduling Conference can proceed as scheduled on May 8, 2013. There is no basis for further delay of this case.

The court once again notes that the Complaint (Docket No. 1) lists only one plaintiff in the caption (Chantel L. Blunk), with "et al" after the one plaintiff's name, but the Local Rules of this court provide that "Parties shall be listed in a caption with one party per line. . . ." D.C.COLO.LCivR10.1(J). Since the original Complaint has not been amended to comply with the Local Rules, the Docket still lists only one plaintiff, Chantel L. Blunk.


Summaries of

Blunk v. Fenton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 15, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00080-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Blunk v. Fenton

Case Details

Full title:CHANTEL L. BLUNK, Plaintiff(s), v. DR. LYNNE FENTON individually, DR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 15, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00080-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 15, 2013)