Opinion
April 24, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Affronti, J.
Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see, Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 A.D.2d 1169, 1170; Sarbro Realty Corp. v Kradjian, 116 A.D.2d 866, 867). We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's request for discovery of information relating to other Tops employees.