From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blumenstock v. Weissman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 30, 1966
50 Misc. 2d 119 (N.Y. App. Term 1966)

Opinion

March 30, 1966

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County, ROBERT J. TRAINOR, J.

Hyman Blumenstock, appellant in person, and for Florence Blumenstock and others, appellants.

Allen M. Taylor and Martin M. Baxter for respondents.


In our opinion the holding of the County Court that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion to vacate its prior determination would be equally applicable to the Justice's Court had an application for similar relief been directed to that court in the first instance. (See Duran v. Chelsea Exch. Bank, 123 Misc. 158.)

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

MARGETT, BRENNER and OLLIFFE, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

Blumenstock v. Weissman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 30, 1966
50 Misc. 2d 119 (N.Y. App. Term 1966)
Case details for

Blumenstock v. Weissman

Case Details

Full title:HYMAN BLUMENSTOCK et al., Appellants, v. NAOMI WEISSMAN et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1966

Citations

50 Misc. 2d 119 (N.Y. App. Term 1966)
269 N.Y.S.2d 507

Citing Cases

Merrill v. Robinson

The doctrine of law of the case rendered Special Term's order of March 11, 1983, which denied plaintiffs'…

Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Park Properties Development Associates

Civil contempt incarceration is not herein considered. (See, n 4.) What effect would the rehearing by the…