From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BLUMENAUER v. LOCH SHELDRAKE AMUSEMENT COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent New Amsterdam Casualty Company. Hinman, Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P.J., votes to modify the judgment by allowing plaintiff the value of the materials which he purchased in his own name and paid for and which thereafter went into the building, and as so modified affirmed; Hill, J., dissents on the ground that the defendant, owner, by advising the filing of lien, construed the relation of plaintiff as that of contractor under the agreement, and that this construction should be adopted by the court. ( Carthage T.P. Mills v. Village of Carthage, 200 N.Y. 1.)


Summaries of

BLUMENAUER v. LOCH SHELDRAKE AMUSEMENT COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

BLUMENAUER v. LOCH SHELDRAKE AMUSEMENT COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:DAVID E. BLUMENAUER, Appellant, v. LOCH SHELDRAKE AMUSEMENT COMPANY, a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)