holding that "loss leader" sales in that case did not give rise to dangerous probability of monopoly
Summary of this case from Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Corp.No. 1355.
June 16, 1969.
C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. James C. McConnon and Henry N. Paul, Jr., for petitioner. Warren N. Williams, Gordon D. Schmidt, W. Francis Marion, and William T. Bullinger for respondents. Reported below: 407 F. 2d 557.
holding that "loss leader" sales in that case did not give rise to dangerous probability of monopoly
Summary of this case from Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Corp.noting that "a substantial part of the market must be controlled by the monopolist to enable the raising and lowering of prices and the undue restriction on competition" and citing nine monopolization cases in which the market share ranged from 70 to 90 percent
Summary of this case from Kolon Indus., Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.surveying cases and noting that percentages greater than 70 percent generally are found to constitute monopoly power.
Summary of this case from Ortho Diagnostic Systems v. Abbott Lab.Full title:BLUMCRAFT OF PITTSBURGH v. CITIZENS SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 16, 1969
This was an eye-witness, invested with "built-in credibility." McCreary v. Sigler, 406 F.2d 1264, 1269 (8…
United States v. Empire Gas Corp.Specific intent need not be proved when it is alleged and proved that monopolization has been accomplished,…