From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blum v. Schmitt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 5, 2018
No. 4:18-CV-1203 PLC (E.D. Mo. Sep. 5, 2018)

Opinion

No. 4:18-CV-1203 PLC

09-05-2018

ROGER BLUM, Petitioner, v. DAVID SCHMITT, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this habeas corpus action. Upon review of the financial information, the Court has determined that petitioner is unable to pay the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The motion will be granted.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED.

/s/_________

PATRICIA L. COHEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated this 5th day of September, 2018


Summaries of

Blum v. Schmitt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 5, 2018
No. 4:18-CV-1203 PLC (E.D. Mo. Sep. 5, 2018)
Case details for

Blum v. Schmitt

Case Details

Full title:ROGER BLUM, Petitioner, v. DAVID SCHMITT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 5, 2018

Citations

No. 4:18-CV-1203 PLC (E.D. Mo. Sep. 5, 2018)