From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blum v. Pearsall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1911
144 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

April, 1911.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that Shirk's authority to employ plaintiff in behalf of the defendant is not proven. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Summaries of

Blum v. Pearsall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1911
144 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

Blum v. Pearsall

Case Details

Full title:Solomon Blum and Jacob Blum, Respondents, v. George W. Pearsall, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1911

Citations

144 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)