From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blum v. Lillis

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Jan 17, 2024
388 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

No. 3D23-0413

01-17-2024

Alon BLUM, Appellant, v. Timothy LILLIS, etc., Appellee.

Luks, Santaniello, Petrillo, Cohen & Peterfriend, and Daniel S. Weinger, Jack Garwood, and Luis Menendez-Aponte, for appellant. Leto Law Firm, and Matthew P. Leto, for appellee.


An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 22-18876

Luks, Santaniello, Petrillo, Cohen & Peterfriend, and Daniel S. Weinger, Jack Garwood, and Luis Menendez-Aponte, for appellant.

Leto Law Firm, and Matthew P. Leto, for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on the appellee’s proper confession of error, we reverse the nonflnal Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Make Timely Service. See Monaco v. Nealon, 810 So, 2d 1084, 1086 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("Failure to timely file an affidavit of compliance alone warrants quashing of the substituted ser vice."). Further, we remand for further proceedings to allow the appellee to effectuate service of process over the appellant.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Blum v. Lillis

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Jan 17, 2024
388 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Blum v. Lillis

Case Details

Full title:Alon Blum, Appellant, v. Timothy Lillis, etc., Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Jan 17, 2024

Citations

388 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)