From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blum v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 28, 2024
No. 5313-16 (U.S.T.C. May. 28, 2024)

Opinion

5313-16

05-28-2024

SCOTT A. BLUM & AUDREY R. BLUM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Joseph Robert Goeke, Judge

This case was called for trial in Tampa, Florida on May 20, 2024. Both parties appeared and were heard. Upon due consideration and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceedings, it is

ORDERED that petitioners' Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Proposed Facts and Evidence Should Not be Accepted as Established Pursuant to Rule 91, filed May 16, 2024, and supplemented on May 17, 2024, is denied as moot. It is further

ORDERED that petitioners' Motion for Reconsideration of Order, filed May 19, 2024, is denied. It is further

ORDERED that respondent's Motion in Limine, filed May 19, 2024, is denied.


Summaries of

Blum v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 28, 2024
No. 5313-16 (U.S.T.C. May. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Blum v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT A. BLUM & AUDREY R. BLUM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: May 28, 2024

Citations

No. 5313-16 (U.S.T.C. May. 28, 2024)