From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blum v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 6, 2024
No. 5313-16 (U.S.T.C. May. 6, 2024)

Opinion

5313-16

05-06-2024

SCOTT A. BLUM & AUDREY R. BLUM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Joseph Robert Goeke, Judge

This case is calendared for trial at the Special Session of the Court in Tampa, Florida on May 20, 2024.

Pending before the Court is respondent's Motion to Permit Witnesses to Testify Remotely, filed May 2, 2024. Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Permit Witnesses to Testify Remotely, filed May 2, 2024, is granted in that Revenue Agent Elia Maglaya, Julie V. Skeen and Cory Stigile are permitted to testify remotely via telephone. It is further

ORDERED that the witnesses testifying by telephone are directed to complete their testimony: (1) with no notes or other documents/information accessible by them (unless permitted by the Court during the testimony); (2) with no one else present in the room with them; and (3) from a quiet location. If they plan to use cellular phones, the witnesses are also directed to testify from a location that they know to have good reception and to not view any text messages, websites, or other information during their testimony. The witnesses must also complete their testimony from the United States, and not be out of the country during the above-referenced Special Session.


Summaries of

Blum v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 6, 2024
No. 5313-16 (U.S.T.C. May. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Blum v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT A. BLUM & AUDREY R. BLUM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: May 6, 2024

Citations

No. 5313-16 (U.S.T.C. May. 6, 2024)