From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blum v. Cain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 2007
38 A.D.3d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2005-10790.

March 20, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered September 28, 2005, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability in favor of the defendant Town of Hempstead and against him, dismissed the complaint.

Carman, Callahan Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale, N.Y. (Michael F. Ingham and James Carman of counsel), for appellant.

Rivkin Radler, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. (Evan H. Krinick, Cheryl F. Korman, Harris J. Zakarin, Merril Biscone, and Melissa M. Murphy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Dillon and Carni, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The court's charge as a whole conveyed the applicable legal principles ( see Manna v Don Diego, 261 AD2d 590, 591; Williams v City of New York, 214 NY 259, 264; Gonzalez v City of New York, 148 AD2d 668, 670).


Summaries of

Blum v. Cain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 2007
38 A.D.3d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Blum v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:WALTER BLUM, Appellant, v. IRWIN B. CAIN et al., Defendants, and TOWN OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2007

Citations

38 A.D.3d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2498
830 N.Y.S.2d 921

Citing Cases

Bizzoco v. County of Westchester

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the evidence adduced at trial did not warrant instructing the jury…