From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bluegem Sec. Inc. v. Trusteer Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 1, 2011
Case No. CV-11-02682 RSWL (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV-11-02682 RSWL (JCG)

08-01-2011

BLUEGEM SECURITY INC., Plaintiff, v. TRUSTEER INC. et al., Defendants.


[TRUSTEER'S PROPOSED] CONFIDENTIALITY ORDERS

1. "Confidential" and "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" Defined. A party producing documents or information as part of its initial disclosures or in response to a discovery request from any other party may designate part or all of the material produced as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only." A party may designate material as "Confidential" if it constitutes "a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information" that the party in good faith believes should be protected under Rule 26(c). A party may designate material as "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" if it constitutes source code for a party's past or present products or material that would qualify as a trade secret under the law of California. The parties shall endeavor to avoid designating as material as "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" if its disclosure to the opposing party's decisionmakers is reasonably necessary to allow other parties to assess the merits of this case for purposes of settlement

2. How to Designate Material as Confidential or Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only. A party may designate initial disclosures, responses to requests for admission, responses to interrogatories, or the answers to a deposition on written questions as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" by stamping "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" on the first page of the document and by clearly identifying what parts of the document are so designated. A party may designate a document produced in response to requests for production or as part of initial disclosures as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" by stamping "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" on the first page of the document and on each page of the document containing designated material and, if the party seeks to designate only parts of certain pages, by clearly identifying what parts of the document are so designated.

3. A party may designate part or all of an oral deposition as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" by serving a written statement on all other parties identifying those parts of the deposition that the party seeks to designate by page number and line number. The designation will take effect as against a party when actually received by that party. A party may also designate part or all of an oral deposition as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" by having the stenographer stamp "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" on the relevant pages of the deposition transcript before that transcript is circulated to the parties. At the request of any party made on the record at the deposition, a deposition shall be treated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" for 30 days following the deposition in order to allow the party to prepare a written designation under this paragraph.

4. Challenges to Designations. Any party may challenge any other party's designation of material as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" by serving written notice of such a challenge on all other parties. If the party who designated the material disagrees with the challenge, the party who designated the material must then apply to this Court for an order determining that the material qualifies for protection as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only." If the party who designated the material files a motion seeking such an order within 21 days of the challenge, then the material shall be treated as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" until the Court rules on the motion. Otherwise, after the 21 dayshave passed, the designation will cease to be effective. The burden of proof shall be on the party seeking to designate material as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" to prove that the material qualifies for that designation under the terms of this order.

5. Effect of a Designation: "Confidential." Material designated as "Confidential" shall be disclosed only to the Court, parties, their attorneys or agents, and persons acting under the direction of their attorneys, including copy services, expert consultants and witnesses, and the like. Such material may not be disclosed to the press or other unrelated third parties.

6. Effect of a Designation: "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only." Material designated as "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" shall be disclosed only to the Court, attorneys of record, and persons acting under the direction of attorneys of record, including law-firm partners or employees, copy services, expert consultants and witnesses, and the like. No material designated as "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only" shall be used for any purpose other than this litigation.

7. Sealing. For all filings other than briefing on dispositive motions, if a party wishes to include material designated as "Confidential" or "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only," that party shall make its filing under seal and shall redact all material so designated from any publicly accessible version of its filing. For briefing on dispositive motions, if a party wishes to include material designated as "Confidential: Attorneys' Eyes Only," that party shall make its filing under seal and shall redact all material so designated from any publicly accessible version of its filing.

8. Privileged Material. No party waives any claim of privilege by producing privileged material in discovery, whether advertently or inadvertently. A party may claim that material that has been produced is privileged at any time by serving written notice of the claim on all other parties no later than 60 days before trial. All other parties shall then return or destroy all copies of the material in question.

It is SO ORDERED.

_____________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bluegem Sec. Inc. v. Trusteer Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 1, 2011
Case No. CV-11-02682 RSWL (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Bluegem Sec. Inc. v. Trusteer Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BLUEGEM SECURITY INC., Plaintiff, v. TRUSTEER INC. et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV-11-02682 RSWL (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)