From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blue v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 25, 2012
3:11-cv-00010-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Sep. 25, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00010-ECR-VPC

09-25-2012

ROBERT BLUE, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.


Order

On July 31, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (#69), recommending that Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction (##50, 51) be denied. No objections have been timely filed to the Report and Recommendation (#69).

The Report and Recommendation (#69) is well-taken, and is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief (##50, 51) is DENIED . The Magistrate Judge thoroughly considered Plaintiff's request and found that Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he is likely to succeed on the merits, likely to suffer irreparable harm related to his underlying claims, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, or that an injunction is in the public interest.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Blue v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 25, 2012
3:11-cv-00010-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Sep. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Blue v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BLUE, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00010-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Sep. 25, 2012)