From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bludworth v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2406 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2406 DAD P

10-03-2011

TIMOTHY LEE BLUDWORTH, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bludworth v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2406 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Bludworth v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY LEE BLUDWORTH, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 3, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2406 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)