From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blount v. Stanley

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1802
3 N.C. 163 (N.C. Super. 1802)

Opinion

(Spring Riding, 1802.)

In equity, a deposition taken in South Carolina by one witness may be read.

IT was objected that the deposition offered by Blount's counsel should not be read, because the commission was directed to and taken in South Carolina by one person only; and by the rules of practice prescribed by the act of 1782 it should be directed to two justices of the peace.


That clause must be confined to depositions to be taken in this State. There are some counties where there are no justices of the peace. If the clause in question extends to all depositions, it would many times happen that the deposition could not be taken at all, for the want of justices.

The deposition was read.

NOTE. — See Carver v. Mallet, 4 N.C. 562.

(164)


Summaries of

Blount v. Stanley

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1802
3 N.C. 163 (N.C. Super. 1802)
Case details for

Blount v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:BLOUNT v. STANLEY

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1802

Citations

3 N.C. 163 (N.C. Super. 1802)