From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloom v. Richardson

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 21, 1941
308 Ill. App. 320 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,468. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed January 21, 1941

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS, § 157lien, right to. In action for attorney's lien, lower court improperly struck the statement of claim, where it alleged that notice of the lien in writing had been served, received and acknowledged, and before client effected settlement of her claim, she was told of such claim for lien and required to give a surety bond to hold harmless the party making the settlement payment.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. FRANK E. DONOGHUE, presiding.

Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Heard in second division, first district, this court at October term, 1940.

Bloom, Cohen Bercov, for appellant;

Maxfield Weisbrod, of counsel;

Frank L. Kriete and Charles V. Falkenberg, for appellees;

Charles V. Falkenberg, of counsel.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed January 21, 1941.


Summaries of

Bloom v. Richardson

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 21, 1941
308 Ill. App. 320 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
Case details for

Bloom v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:S. Edward Bloom, Appellant, v. Guy A. Richardson et al., Trading as…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jan 21, 1941

Citations

308 Ill. App. 320 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
31 N.E.2d 368

Citing Cases

Beesen-Dwars v. Duane Morris LLP

The holding is not as broad as plaintiff suggests, however. The court distinguished Bloom v. Richardson, 31…

Unger v. Checker Taxi Co.

[6] Plaintiff next contends that a valid attorney's lien exists where the defendant admits or has actual…