From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloom v. Konner

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 2004
864 So. 2d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-3226.

Opinion filed February 4, 2004.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lower Tribunal No. 00-4495, Maria M. Korvick, Judge.

Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster Russell and John H. Pelzer and Kristie J. Myers, for appellant.

Akerman Senterfitt and David R. Carlisle and Nancy A. Copperthwaite, for appellee.

Before COPE, GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.


Given that the appellant's noncompliance with the court order regarding the deposit was called to the attention of appellant in ample time to cure the deficiency, and he did not do so, we conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion in enforcing the explicit terms of its earlier order. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Bloom v. Konner

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 2004
864 So. 2d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Bloom v. Konner

Case Details

Full title:NORTON BLOOM, Appellant, v. SANDRA KONNER, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 4, 2004

Citations

864 So. 2d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)