From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloom v. Crosson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1993
82 N.Y.2d 768 (N.Y. 1993)

Opinion

Argued September 2, 1993

Decided October 7, 1993

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Lawrence E. Kahn, J.

Cahn Wishod Wishod Lamb, Melville (Richard C. Cahn, Eugene L. Wishod, Scott M. Karson, Frederick Eisenbud and Howard M. Miller of counsel), for appellants.

Michael Colodner, New York City, and John Eiseman, Stephen E. Gross, Lawrence K. Marks and Kenneth Falk for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the negative for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division ( 183 A.D.2d 341).

Concur: Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and SMITH. Taking no part: Chief Judge KAYE and Judge LEVINE.


Summaries of

Bloom v. Crosson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1993
82 N.Y.2d 768 (N.Y. 1993)
Case details for

Bloom v. Crosson

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD M. BLOOM, as Kings County Surrogate, et al., Appellants, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 7, 1993

Citations

82 N.Y.2d 768 (N.Y. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 991
624 N.E.2d 175

Citing Cases

LaSalle Bank v. Pace

In delineating the functions of the chief administrator of the courts, Judiciary Law § 212(2)(d) contains a…

Thompson v. The State Office of Court Admin.

The Chief Judge's delegation of the function and duty to assign judges is likewise repeated in Rules of the…