From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloom v. Boadwine

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 30, 2019
Docket No. A-1-CA-37652 (N.M. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2019)

Opinion

Docket No. A-1-CA-37652

04-30-2019

TARA JOY BLOOM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL STEPHEN BOADWINE, Defendant-Appellant.

COUNSEL Tara Joy Bloom, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellee Michael Stephen Boadwine, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant.


This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, David K. Thomson, District Judge

COUNSEL

Tara Joy Bloom, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellee

Michael Stephen Boadwine, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant.

JUDGES

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge. WE CONCUR: KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge, MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

AUTHOR: J. MILES HANISEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge.

{1} Summary affirmance in part and remand to the district court for clarification was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the notice of summary disposition has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMAND TO DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARIFICATION.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge


Summaries of

Bloom v. Boadwine

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 30, 2019
Docket No. A-1-CA-37652 (N.M. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Bloom v. Boadwine

Case Details

Full title:TARA JOY BLOOM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL STEPHEN BOADWINE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Apr 30, 2019

Citations

Docket No. A-1-CA-37652 (N.M. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2019)