From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloodworth v. Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2011
No. CIV-S-09-3351 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-09-3351 WBS CKD P

08-31-2011

DEREK J. BLOODWORTH, Plaintiff, v. M. HAMILTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On July 22, 2011, defendant Hamilton filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bloodworth v. Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2011
No. CIV-S-09-3351 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Bloodworth v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:DEREK J. BLOODWORTH, Plaintiff, v. M. HAMILTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 31, 2011

Citations

No. CIV-S-09-3351 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)