From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloodworth v. Hamilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV-S-09-3351 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-09-3351 WBS CKD P.

September 1, 2011


ORDER


On July 22, 2011, defendant Hamilton filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Dated: August 31, 2011


Summaries of

Bloodworth v. Hamilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV-S-09-3351 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Bloodworth v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:DEREK J. BLOODWORTH, Plaintiff, v. M. HAMILTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

No. CIV-S-09-3351 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)