From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloodsworth v. Brooks

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jun 30, 2008
CIVIL ACTION 06-0252-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Jun. 30, 2008)

Summary

holding that unjustified slap that caused no injuries was de minimis force and did not violate the constitution

Summary of this case from Washington v. Wigington

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 06-0252-CG-M.

June 30, 2008


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bloodsworth v. Brooks

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jun 30, 2008
CIVIL ACTION 06-0252-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Jun. 30, 2008)

holding that unjustified slap that caused no injuries was de minimis force and did not violate the constitution

Summary of this case from Washington v. Wigington
Case details for

Bloodsworth v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:MACK BLOODSWORTH, JR., Plaintiff, v. JAMES BROOKS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Jun 30, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 06-0252-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Jun. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Wigington

Weighing the allegations - that a prisoner argued with an officer about the prisoner's wish to stand up when…

Marshall v. Tatum

See Ledlow v. Givens, 500 F. App'x 910 (11th Cir. 2012) (slap that potentially resulted in bloody nose and…