From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blond v. Lempke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 13, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 67296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

Motion No: CA 12-00334

03-13-2012

IN THE MATTER OF MARK BLOND, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. SUPERINTENDENT LEMPKE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.


PRESENT: , P. J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ.

Appellant having moved for permission to proceed as a poor person and assignment of counsel on the appeal taken herein from a judgment of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Seneca on January 6, 2012,

Now, upon reading and filing the statement of Mark W. Blond, Jr. dated February 3, 2012, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon the filing and service of a new motion with an affidavit setting forth sufficient facts so that the merit of the contentions can be ascertained (see CPLR 1101 [a]; 22 NYCRR 1000.14 [a]).

Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk


Summaries of

Blond v. Lempke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 13, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 67296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Blond v. Lempke

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MARK BLOND, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. SUPERINTENDENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 13, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 67296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Citing Cases

Morganstern v. Tulchin

This section has been construed to be prohibitory, leaving the court no discretion to extend the time. (See…