From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blodgett v. Bd. of Supervisors of County of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 25, 1935
246 App. Div. 188 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

November 25, 1935.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Monroe County.

Marvin R. Dye, County Attorney, for the appellants.

Raymond E. Westbury, for the respondent.

Present — SEARS, P.J., EDGCOMB, THOMPSON, CROSBY and LEWIS, JJ.


The position held by the petitioner (a disabled veteran) has been abolished by action of the board of supervisors and consequently no appropriation for salary has been made. No new employees have been taken on to perform the work formerly done by the petitioner. The duties formerly performed by petitioner have been absorbed by another employee holding the position of secretary. Work of the same type, caliber and kind as that previously done by petitioner has been performed by employees of the Civil Works Administration and Temporary Emergency Relief Administration. There is no proof that the secretary is not legally competent to perform the work which he has absorbed and the mere performance of similar work by the emergency agencies gives petitioner no right to reinstatement. No claim is made that the board of supervisors acted in bad faith in abolishing the office. The petitioner to succeed in his effort to be reinstated would have to show that his position still existed and that an appropriation to cover the salary had been made. ( Matter of Danker v. Dept. of Health, 266 N.Y. 365.) In both respects he has failed. The Special Term did not give consideration to the petitioner's claim to a right to a transfer to the Department of Highways under the provisions of section 22 Civ. Serv. of the Civil Service Law. This was not necessary in the view the Special Term took as to reinstatement. Now we think it is necessary and we are, therefore, remitting the matter for a consideration of that phase only.

All concur.


Order reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term for further consideration, without costs.


Summaries of

Blodgett v. Bd. of Supervisors of County of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 25, 1935
246 App. Div. 188 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Blodgett v. Bd. of Supervisors of County of Monroe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of HENRY R. BLODGETT, Respondent, for a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1935

Citations

246 App. Div. 188 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
285 N.Y.S. 370

Citing Cases

Matter of Wipfler v. Klebes

This is fatal to the application of the petitioner. ( Matter of Danker v. Dept. of Health, 266 N.Y. 365;…

Matter of Stryker v. Bd. of Educ. of City of N.Y

1) is to protect a veteran from arbitrary removal by requiring notice and a hearing where it is sought to…