From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blocker v. Mapco, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Aug 2, 2006
Civil No. 3:04-0401 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:04-0401.

August 2, 2006


ORDER

On June 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the defendant's Renewal Motion for Reasonable Attorney's Fees be denied. (Docket No. 43) No timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Renewal Motion for Reasonable Attorney's Fees (Docket No. 38) is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Blocker v. Mapco, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Aug 2, 2006
Civil No. 3:04-0401 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Blocker v. Mapco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:COREY D. BLOCKER, Plaintiff, v. MAPCO, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Aug 2, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 3:04-0401 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2006)

Citing Cases

Southall v. United Statesf Holland, Inc.

Simply stated, "a district court may in its discretion award attorney's fees to a prevailing defendant in a…