Opinion
Gen. No. 40,937. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed May 20, 1940
MASTER AND SERVANT, § 61 — action for wages, sufficiency of evidence. In action for wages based on oral contract, court properly entered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict, where plaintiff claimed he was to head a production department in making pianos, and was to receive as compensation money remaining after paying all men in the department, but he received about $50 per week, which defendant claimed was the maximum, he made no claim for more money until some years later, and the 5-year statute of limitations barred action for alleged unpaid portions.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. JOHN T. ZURIS, presiding.
Affirmed. Heard in first division, first district, this court at October term, 1939.
Schachner Siegan, Charles C. Spencer and Richard M. Spencer, for appellant;
Alden, Latham Young, for appellee;
Carl R. Latham and Norman A. Korfist, of counsel.
"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed May 20, 1940.