From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Block v. Pal Bros.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 14, 2023
1:22-cv-01394-SAB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01394-SAB

03-14-2023

HENDRIK BLOCK, Plaintiff, v. PAL BROTHERS LLC, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

(ECF No. 16)

On March 13, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal. (ECF No. 16.) In light of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Block v. Pal Bros.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 14, 2023
1:22-cv-01394-SAB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Block v. Pal Bros.

Case Details

Full title:HENDRIK BLOCK, Plaintiff, v. PAL BROTHERS LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 14, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-01394-SAB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2023)