From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Block v. Cortez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 18, 2023
1:22-cv-00908-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00908-JLT-SAB

01-18-2023

HENDRIK BLOCK, Plaintiff, v. JOHANNA R. CORTEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

(ECF NO. 27)

On January 17, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 27.) In light of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Block v. Cortez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 18, 2023
1:22-cv-00908-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Block v. Cortez

Case Details

Full title:HENDRIK BLOCK, Plaintiff, v. JOHANNA R. CORTEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 18, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-00908-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)