From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bliss v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.


Order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave, however, to defendant to move for a rehearing of the motion, at which rehearing he may interpose an affidavit, as required by rule 113, in which may be incorporated evidentiary facts disclosing a triable fact under the answer herein with respect to the amount due under the bond, or in any other respect. The defendant having interposed no affidavit showing a triable issue, the motion should have been granted. Opportunity should be afforded the defendant to avail himself of his rights under rule 113 if he be so advised and the facts justify his doing so. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bliss v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Bliss v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:GRACE BLISS, Appellant, v. WILLIAM HAMILTON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Newman v. Special

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment granted,…