From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bliss v. CoreCivic, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 21, 2022
2:18-cv-01280-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-cv-01280-JAD-EJY

04-21-2022

Kathleen Bliss, on behalf of herself, the Proposed Nationwide Rule 23 Class, and the Proposed Nevada Subclass, Plaintiff, v. CoreCivic, Inc., Defendant

Daniel P. Struck (admitted pro hac vice) AZ Bar No. 012377 Rachel Love (admitted pro hac vice) AZ Bar No. 019881 Jacob B. Lee NV Bar No. 012428 Ashlee B. Hesman NV Bar No. 012740 Anne M. Orcutt (admitted pro hac vice) AZ Bar No. 029387 Eden G. Cohen (admitted pro hac vice) AZ Bar No. 034529 Struck Love Bojanowski & Acedo, PLC Gina G. Winspear Nevada Bar No. 005552 Dennett Winspear, LLP Attorneys for Defendant CoreCivic, Inc.


Daniel P. Struck (admitted pro hac vice) AZ Bar No. 012377

Rachel Love (admitted pro hac vice) AZ Bar No. 019881

Jacob B. Lee NV Bar No. 012428

Ashlee B. Hesman NV Bar No. 012740

Anne M. Orcutt (admitted pro hac vice) AZ Bar No. 029387

Eden G. Cohen (admitted pro hac vice) AZ Bar No. 034529

Struck Love Bojanowski & Acedo, PLC

Gina G. Winspear Nevada Bar No. 005552

Dennett Winspear, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant CoreCivic, Inc.

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (Dkt. 187) (EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTED)

Defendant CoreCivic respectfully requests a one-week extension of the deadline to file its response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant's Responses to Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents (Dkt. 187). This request is necessary because Defendant and defense counsel are currently engaged in (1) analysis and preparation of deliverables to aid both parties in finalizing search terms, custodians, and amended protocols to meet the April 29, 2022 deadline for agreement as to the second-stage ESI collection/production process; and (2) ongoing preparation of CoreCivic's 30(b)(6) deponent to testify regarding the 47 facilities at issue at the 30(b)(6 deposition set for April 25, 2022. This is the first requested extension of the deadline for Defendant's response to Plaintiffs Motion. Plaintiff does not object to the requested extension and it will not impact any other case deadlines, given that there is no trial date set, and Plaintiff deadline for disclosing class certification experts is not until September 2022. Accordingly Defendant requests that the Court extend the deadline from April 22, 2022 to April 29, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bliss v. CoreCivic, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 21, 2022
2:18-cv-01280-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Bliss v. CoreCivic, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Kathleen Bliss, on behalf of herself, the Proposed Nationwide Rule 23…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 21, 2022

Citations

2:18-cv-01280-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2022)