From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bliss v. CoreCivic, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 2, 2023
2:18-CV-01280-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:18-CV-01280-JAD-EJY

02-02-2023

Kathleen Bliss, on behalf of herself, the Proposed Nationwide Rule 23 Class, and the Proposed Nevada Subclass, Plaintiff, v. CoreCivic, Inc., Defendant.

NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP Matthew H. Morgan Anna P. Prakash Charles A. Delbridge Rebekah L. Bailey Charles J. O'Meara NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP STRUCK LOVE BOJANOWSKI & ACEDO, PLC Anne. M. Orcutt Daniel P. Struck Rachel Love Jacob B. Lee Ashlee B. Hesman Anne M. Orcutt Eden G. Cohen Matthew C. Helland NICHOLS KASTER, LLP Michael Hodgson THE HODGSON LAW FIRM, LLC Lance D. Sandage SANDAGE LAW LLC Joseph K. Eischens LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH K. EISCHENS Paul S. Padda PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Classes Gina G. Winspear DENNETT WINSPEAR Attorneys for Defendant CoreCivic, Inc


NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP

Matthew H. Morgan

Anna P. Prakash

Charles A. Delbridge

Rebekah L. Bailey

Charles J. O'Meara

NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP

STRUCK LOVE BOJANOWSKI & ACEDO, PLC

Anne. M. Orcutt

Daniel P. Struck

Rachel Love

Jacob B. Lee

Ashlee B. Hesman

Anne M. Orcutt

Eden G. Cohen

Matthew C. Helland

NICHOLS KASTER, LLP

Michael Hodgson

THE HODGSON LAW FIRM, LLC

Lance D. Sandage

SANDAGE LAW LLC

Joseph K. Eischens

LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH K. EISCHENS

Paul S. Padda

PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC

PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Classes

Gina G. Winspear

DENNETT WINSPEAR

Attorneys for Defendant CoreCivic, Inc

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES (FOURTH REQUEST)

The parties respectfully request that the Court adopt the modifications to the scheduling order set forth below with respect to Defendant's expert disclosures and both parties' class certification briefing:

1. Deadline for Plaintiff to produce Supplemental Declaration from Alexander Wise for use in Plaintiffs class certification briefing set as March 17, 2023.

2. Deadline for Defendant's class certification expert disclosures extended from February 17, 2023 until April 21, 2023.

3. Deadline for completion of class certification expert discovery, which was inadvertently not addressed in the parties' October 14, 2022 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines (Dkt. 216), is extended from November 17, 2022 to May 12, 2023.

4. Class certification briefing schedule modified as proposed in the table below:

Filing Current

Deadline

Proposed New Deadline

Plaintiff's opening class certification brief

March 31, 2023

June 2, 2023

Defendant's class certification response brief

May 1, 2023

July 14, 2023

Plaintiff's class certification reply brief

May 31, 2023

August 14, 2023

This is the fourth request to extend time to file Defendant's expert disclosures and the parties' class certification briefs. (See ECF Nos. 86, 155, and 216 (the parties' previous requests).) The existing case schedule has been in place since October 4, 2021. (ECF No. 156.) Since that time, the parties have made significant progress on discovery necessary for class certification. However, the primary outstanding discovery that is relevant to class certification is from third-party telephone vendors. The parties make this request because they are still working to obtain complete data productions from multiple telephone vendors. Securus has agreed to produce, but has not yet begun production of, call data from 16 facilities. Counsel for Securus anticipates that the production will take approximately two weeks. GTL has made two productions to date, but during the 30(b)(6) deposition of the GTL designee, it became apparent that there is additional GTL call data to produce for La Palma Correctional Center, Saguaro Correctional Center, and Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, as well as a potential re-production of call data from Marion County Jail II. GTL's counsel is still confirming the scope of additional production/re-production and has not yet provided a timeframe. Following the Securus production, the parties will need to depose a vendor representative from Securus regarding the call data, and the parties will need time to review the data from both vendors and incorporate it into their analyses.

IT IS SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Bliss v. CoreCivic, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 2, 2023
2:18-CV-01280-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Bliss v. CoreCivic, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Kathleen Bliss, on behalf of herself, the Proposed Nationwide Rule 23…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 2, 2023

Citations

2:18-CV-01280-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 2, 2023)