"When the special finding of facts is inconsistent with the general verdict, the former controls the latter, and the court may give judgment accordingly." A., T. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 3 Okla. 55. 41 P. 641: Blevins v. A., T. S. F. Ry. Co., 3 Okla. 524, 41 P. 92. We think, as was said by this court in the case of Standifer v. Morris et al., supra, an application of the occupying claimant's act will work substantial justice between the parties to this suit, and that upon equitable grounds the finding of the court that the defendant, Green, entered upon the premises in question under a warranty deed executed by the plaintiff to the defendant in the bona fide belief that he was the owner and that title in fee simple vested in him, was amply sustained by the evidence, and likewise was the finding of the jury in favor of the defendant in the sum of $4,102.70, the amount due him for money loaned the plaintiff with accrued interest thereon, $2,500, and for $1,602.70 after adjusting between the parties the rental value of $275, against the amount paid by the defendant for repairs and taxes for the years 1915 and 1916.