From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1952
279 App. Div. 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

April 7, 1952.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See ante, p. 806.]


Motion by plaintiff for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following questions are certified: 1. Was the order of the Special Term entered March 27, 1950, insofar as it dismissed the third cause of action against M.A. Henry Co., Inc., properly made? 2. Was the order of the Special Term entered March 27, 1950, insofar as it dismissed the third cause of action against Woonsocket Falls Mill and William E. Roschen and others, individually and as copartners doing business under the firm name and style of E.F. Timme Son, properly made? 3. Was the order of the Special Term entered March 27, 1950, denying the motion of the plaintiff to amend the amended complaint by adding thereto the proposed fourth cause of action, properly made? 4. Was the order of the Special Term entered May 22, 1950, insofar as it dismissed the third cause of action against defendant McCrory Stores Corporation, properly made?


Summaries of

Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1952
279 App. Div. 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BLESSINGTON, as Administrator of the Estate of MICHAEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)