From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blessett v. Fouch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
2:19-cv-1992 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1992 JAM AC P

09-01-2021

ANTOINE LA'MAR BLESSETT, Plaintiff, v. A. FOUCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 19, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. /// //

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued July 19, 2021 (ECF No. 9), are ADOPTED in full, and

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Blessett v. Fouch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
2:19-cv-1992 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Blessett v. Fouch

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINE LA'MAR BLESSETT, Plaintiff, v. A. FOUCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 1, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1992 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)