From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blessett v. Fouch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 19, 2021
2:19-cv-1992 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1992 AC P

07-19-2021

ANTOINE LA'MAR BLESSETT, Plaintiff, v. A. FOUCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On June 8, 2021, the undersigned determined that plaintiff's complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See ECF No. 5 at 3-5. Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. Id. Thirty days have now passed, and plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint, nor has he responded to the court's order in any way.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Blessett v. Fouch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 19, 2021
2:19-cv-1992 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Blessett v. Fouch

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINE LA'MAR BLESSETT, Plaintiff, v. A. FOUCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1992 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)