Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Bledsoe v. Buttery

No. E2003-01576-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2004)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Bledsoe v. Buttery

1 Citing case

  1. GOVERNMENT EMPL v. BLOODWORTH

    No. M2003-02986-COA-R10-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jun. 29, 2007)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that courts should avoid choice-of-law questions unless "the law of the other state or states differs materially from applicable Tennessee law"

    The question of whether the damaged property is capable of restoration, or has been restored, to substantially the same value and condition as it had before the accident is a question of fact to be determined by the jury or factfinder. Yazoo M.V.R. Co., 185 S.W.2d at 529-30; Bledsoe v. Buttry, No. E2003-01576-COA-R3-CV, 2004 WL 2378247 (Tenn.Ct.App. Oct. 25, 2004) (perm. app. denied March 28, 2005); Tate v. United Inns, Inc., 1984 WL 568927, *2 (Tenn.Ct.App.) (Tenn.Ct.App. Feb. 13, 1984).