From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bleakley v. Bleakley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 23, 1996
680 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-0067.

September 4, 1996. Rehearing and Clarification Denied October 23, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Linda L. Vitale, J.

Diane H. Tutt of Diane H. Tutt, P.A., Plantation, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Steven Gary and Albert Wilensky, Miami, for appellee/cross-appellant.


We affirm the lower court's order except for the husband's required monthly payment towards the wife's attorney fees. The prescribed payment amount is too low as it does not cover even the monthly interest on the principal amount and the husband has the ability to pay more. Urbieta v. Urbieta, 469 So.2d 930 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), found an abuse of discretion where the court assigned a monthly payment too low in proportion to the assets and income of the husband. The same situation exists here.

We remand the monthly fee payment issue to the trial court for a determination of a fee payment appropriate to the husband's income level in proportion to the principal owed.

GUNTHER, C.J., and POLEN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Bleakley v. Bleakley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 23, 1996
680 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Bleakley v. Bleakley

Case Details

Full title:GARY BLEAKLEY, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, v. JACQUELINE ANN BLEAKLEY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 23, 1996

Citations

680 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Williams

Such minimal installment payments are unreasonable and defeat the purpose of the award. See Urbieta v.…

Bleakley v. Bleakley

The monthly payment was later changed to $700 after appeal to this court and remand. See Bleakley v.…