From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bldg. Owners & Managers Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. City of Pittsburgh

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Nov 29, 2017
No. 229 WAL 2017 (Pa. Nov. 29, 2017)

Opinion

No. 229 WAL 2017 No. 230 WAL 2017

11-29-2017

BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH, AND WILLIAM PEDUTO, AND SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32 BJ PETITION OF: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2017, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, limited to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all other issues.

The issue, rephrased for clarity, is as follows:

Did the Commonwealth Court err in holding that the State Emergency Management Services Code, the State Disease Prevention and Control Act Law, the Second Class City Code, and the Home Rule Charter and Options Law failed to satisfy the "expressly provided by statute" exception, and that the City of Pittsburgh therefore lacked the authority to pass the Paid Sick Days Act and the Safe and Secure Buildings Act?

The appeals from Nos. 227-230 WAL 2017 and Nos. 236-239 WAL 2017 are hereby CONSOLIDATED for briefing and oral argument.


Summaries of

Bldg. Owners & Managers Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. City of Pittsburgh

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Nov 29, 2017
No. 229 WAL 2017 (Pa. Nov. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Bldg. Owners & Managers Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. City of Pittsburgh

Case Details

Full title:BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH v. CITY OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 29, 2017

Citations

No. 229 WAL 2017 (Pa. Nov. 29, 2017)