From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bldg. Inspection Ser. v. Olemberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 15, 1985
476 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

Nos. 85-605, 85-606.

October 15, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Martin Greenbaum, J.

Siegfried, Kipnis Rivera and Lisa Millhauser, Miami, for appellant.

Douglas D. Stratton and Pedro A. Cofino, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.


We hold that a letter filed in a cause by an officer of a defendant corporation, advising the court that the corporation is attempting to engage an attorney to represent it, constitutes a "paper" under Rule 1.500(a) Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, See Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 462 So.2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Accord Dalminter, Inc., v. Jessie Edwards, Inc., 27 F.R.D. 491 (S.D.Tex. 1961); McClintock v. Serv-Us Bakers, 103 Ariz. 72, 436 P.2d 891 (1968); Best v. Jones, 644 P.2d 89 (Colo. App. 1982); Roland v. W L Motor Lines, Inc., 32 N.C. App. 288, 231 S.E.2d 685 (1977); See also Hankin v. Blissett, 475 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and, a default entered by a clerk, with such a "paper" in the file, was not authorized, therefore the trial court erred in refusing to set same aside. Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, N.A., supra; Chester, Blackburn Roder, Inc. v. Marchese, 383 So.2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Mo-Con Properties, Inc., v. American Mechanical, Inc., 289 So.2d 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Bldg. Inspection Ser. v. Olemberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 15, 1985
476 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Bldg. Inspection Ser. v. Olemberg

Case Details

Full title:BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES, INC. OF DADE, A FLORIDA CORPORATION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 15, 1985

Citations

476 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)