From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blazynski v. Gallagher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 18, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Eire County, Flaherty, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant The Trolley Stop was entitled to summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's common-law negligence cause of action against it because the accident occurred beyond The Trolley Stop's sphere of control (see, Delamater v Kimmerle, 104 A.D.2d 242; Wright v Sunset Recreation, 91 A.D.2d 701). We conclude, however, that the court properly denied The Trolley Stop's motion for summary judgment with respect to plaintiff's Dram Shop cause of action because plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact whether the driver who injured plaintiff was visibly intoxicated when she was sold alcoholic beverages at The Trolley Stop (see generally, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 N.Y.2d 1065, 1067-1068; cf., Terbush v Buchman, 147 A.D.2d 826).


Summaries of

Blazynski v. Gallagher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Blazynski v. Gallagher

Case Details

Full title:TAMARA L. BLAZYNSKI, Respondent, v. JUDITH A. GALLAGHER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
590 N.Y.S.2d 365

Citing Cases

Zuccari v. Hoffman

Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant sold the beer to Hoffman, we conclude that the sale did not occur at…

Lihs Beverages, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (2) was amended in 1986, several years prior to the incident in question,…